English and Scientific names:

Say's Phoebe (Sayornis saya)

Number of individuals: 

One, age and sex undetermined.

Locality: LOUISIANA: 

Vermilion Parish

Specific Locality:

North of Kaplan, LA, on Shams Road

Date(s) when observed:

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Time(s) of day when observed:  

Approximately 8:30 AM, for about 20 minutes

Reporting observer and address:

Kevin Morgan

Baton Rouge, LA  70806

Other observers accompanying reporter who also identified the bird(s):

Nancy Newfield, John Sevenair, Steve Locke

Other observers accompanying reporter who independently identified the bird(s):

Previously found by Justin & Devin Bosler

Light conditions (position of bird in relation to shade and to direction and amount of light):

Bird moved continuously between partial shade and full sunlight, allowing good looks in both lighting conditions. Bird was backlit at times depending on perching location and observer position, but was generally well-seen.

Optical equipment: 

Binoculars (10x42, excellent condition) by primary observer. Other observers had equal or better binoculars and two scopes, both excellent quality and with eyepieces set at 20x.

Distance to bird(s): 

Approximately 20-25 yards

Duration of observation:

20 minutes

Habitat: 

Farmyard adjacent to a ricefield

Behavior of bird: 

Bird was observed darting out to (presumably) feed and returning to perch on (usually) an adjacent fencewire or part of the building. It was quite active, seldom remaining in one exact place for more than a minute, usually less.

Description:

Bird appeared slightly smaller than a cardinal, typical phoebe-shaped, with a gray back and throat. Underparts were an orangey-salmony brown (my best description from a color-name-challenged individual).

Voice:

Not heard.

Similar species:

Other Phoebes (Eastern and Black) eliminated due to coloration (back too pale and underparts too bright). Bird was clearly a flycatcher, almost certainly a phoebe, and no other U.S. flycatcher has this coloration.

Photographs or tape recordings obtained?

None (however, see the Boslers' photos of the same bird, taken the day before but not viewed by me until after I saw the bird)

Previous experience with this species: 

None outside of field guides.

Identification aids:

at time of observation:  Sibley's Guide to Birds
after observation:  Sibley's Field Guide to Birds, (Eastern and Western)
National Geographic Complete Birds of North America

This description is written from: 

Notes taken at time of observation and immediately after (during discussion with other observers); except that notes on optical equipment were reconstructed from memory--I am familiar with the specific equipment used by all four observers so I made no notes on that at the time.

Are you positive of your identification? If not, explain: 

 

Yes.

Reporter: 

Kevin Morgan

Date and time: 

October 26, 2007 5:15 PM